[ domov ] [ b / # ] [ pol / # ] [ p / # ] [ int / # ] [ x / # ] [ gp / # ] [ kuko ]

/pol/ - Politika

Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1587884174642.jpg (63.06 KB, 500x714, saved from hitler.jpg)

 No.2169

Tak jsem pánové dočetl Mein Kampf (který jsem začal číst, jelikož jste mě nazvali náckem, tak abych věděl, čím mám být). No musím říct, že mi to možná trochu změnilo myšlení. Jednak teda třeba říct, že to není dílo, které je primárně určeno PROTI někomu, ale hlavní část je ZA něco, co Hitler miluje - tedy jeho lidi, jeho soukmenovce, Němce. Ti byli podle něj samozřejmě ohrožování mnoha živly. Jako velký problém vnímal např. Čechy (a když čtete jak popisuje co se dělo v tehdejší době v rakousku, tak jste schopni načrtnout hromadu paralel s našimi zeměmi před národním obrozením). A stejně jako mnozí Čeští velikáni národního obrození, i on označil jako další velký problém Židy. A tady mě vážně zamrazilo, protože jeho popis židovských postupů by mohl kreslit paralely ze současností. Ale při čtení tech řádků mě nejen mrazilo, ale taky mi ty řádky mnohem více osvětlily, jak vlastně současný svět funguje, jaká je v něm úloha neomarxismu a mezinárodního kapitálu a např. médií. Jsem tedy nácek? To rozhodněte vy. Nemůžu říct, že program NSDAP by mi ze 100% imponoval. Ale s identifikací problému 100% souhlasím a všem vám doporučuju si Mein Kampf přečíst.

 No.2170

>A stejně jako mnozí Čeští velikáni národního obrození, i on označil jako další velký problém Židy. A tady mě vážně zamrazilo, protože jeho popis židovských postupů by mohl kreslit paralely ze současností.
Practices of jewry during the 1920s? The jewish community had already achieved high status in Germany and Austria thousands of years before that, from the period spanning Constantine's edict to the Teutonic conquest of Prussia itself. Austria-Hungary at the time of Hitler's birth was already infested with jewish oligarchs, which is partially why it fell.
During the period of Charlemagne alone, the jewish Radhanites were literally taking Slavic slaves from Czechia and selling them in markets from North Africa to China and southeast Asia, Charlemagne even gave the jews a kingdom of their own in Septimania, and oppressed the VIsigoths showing their own racial hatred, calling them Cagots (Gothic dogs). Their antagonism to the Germans thus doesn't just go back to being persecuted in the 40s, 20s, or in the middle ages; because they weren't. I'm assuming you're still learning about the jewish question, in this case, check out this thread: >>1788 for information about medieval and ancient jewry.
>Ale při čtení tech řádků mě nejen mrazilo, ale taky mi ty řádky mnohem více osvětlily, jak vlastně současný svět funguje, jaká je v něm úloha neomarxismu a mezinárodního kapitálu a např. médií
The thing with jewish use of the media is that the media itself (post-18th century) has almost always answered to the government or to intel, which jews have played a role in for a long time due to their drive to subversion; namely, they've mixed with Europeans and had them do their bidding. Same with their role as a financial elite; the church forbade usury, but since the jews were okay with charging usury towards all gentiles, the church accepted them, and they had quickly become a financial elite in medieval France, the HRE, and England, which is all reflected today.

 No.2172

>thank god we saved the west from hitler
You mean the same Hitler who served as a government informant to spy on right-wing factions, who wasn't even elected into office but appointed chancellor by philosemite and jew-apologist Paul von Hindenburg in 1933 (they love their 33s), built up a communist-tier messianic cult around himself (or his handlers did) comparable to Stalin, Lenin, Marx, and Mao, banned other anti-jewish political factions, engaged in series of suicidal moves on both the Western and Eastern fronts (France was supposed to be a much more bloody battle, the generals just claimed the radios weren't working for why they didn't obey bad orders), KILLED GERMANS ACCUSED OF HARMING JEWS IN SOME WAY (such as German soldiers executed for supposedly robbing some jews of jewelry, or executing two German soldiers because a jewess said they raped her (which is highly unlikely considering how ugly jews are)), and ruled a country where jews were actually left largely unmolested all the way to 1945 (the jews that mainly went to the camps (where they were safe from the bloodshed whites were suffering on the outside) were mostly from Eastern Europe, and usually the lower IQ ones like hasidim)? Who, along with Bormann, Himmler, Goebbels, and others, needlessly antagonized the Slavic populations despite most of them (the non-Polish ones) seeing the Germans as liberators (a lower-level German officer even complained of the malice NS Germany was showing to the peoples of occupied Lithuania)?

I will bet a generous sum that Hitler/NS/fascism/etc. were all part of a massive op geared toward the destruction of white nations, particularly one aimed at killing off the "non-cucked" portions of the white race, an operation that has largely succeeded. Why do you think all of these modern spook outlets aggressively push neo-NS and Hitler idolization, extremely comparable to the way Muslims aggressively and uncritically push Islam and Muhammad?

Heh, I just remembered. Hitler even stated that Germans share more in common with Arabs than they do with the French. That should say a lot.

 No.2173

File: 1587931262475-0.jpg (132.7 KB, 800x546, Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-H268….jpg)

File: 1587931262475-1.jpg (113.99 KB, 640x820, adolf-hitler-575021.jpg)

>>2172
>banned other anti-jewish political factions
While that could refer to literal faggots (like the Strasserists, Ernst Röhm et. al.), he did actually try to phase out non-NS anti-jewish movements (notably, the DNVP). Speaking of that, didn't Hitler actually ban anti-jewish newspapers that he used to read while he was still in Vienna? I'm not talking about Ostara (which was filled with nonsense), but he banned that as well, despite it being claimed as Hitler's primary influence in Wiki.
>Adolf Hitler was reportedly one of the publication's readers while in his youth[citation needed] and there is speculation that it served as a catalyst for his antisemitism.[citation needed]
>Hitler, however, refused to acknowledge any debt to Lanz and his paper. After Austria was annexed by Nazi Germany in 1938, Lanz hoped for Hitler's patronage, but Hitler banned him from publishing his writings, and most notably copies of Ostara were removed from circulation. After the war, Lanz accused Hitler of having not only stolen but corrupted his idea, and also of being of "inferior racial stock".
Hitler also banned the Reichsflagge (as in, the original black/white/red flag that the German Empire used) for some reason. I'm not claiming that the Kaiser was perfect, but the abolition of the Reichsflagge always seemed suspicious, as it marked an erasure of older German traditions; as did the needless antagonism towards older Austrian institutions after the Anschluss,
http://www.documentarchiv.de/ns/1935/flaggen1935_ges.html
Most notably, although modern sources claim Hitler banned the continuation of the Teutonic order, the NSDAP used the Teutonic order in its propaganda (which symbolised antagonism towards Balts, as that's what the Teutonic knights were dedicated towards doing). This falls into a larger umbrella of Hitler and Goebbels sometimes speaking out against the church entirely (ditto with "positive Christianity"), and sometimes being cozy with the pope. He even once said that he was "carrying out the same policy the church did for 1500 years", even though that policy put jews into high positions of power.

 No.2174

Something else that needs to be stressed about Hitler's policies is that he had "capitalistic" tendencies himself, which is why American corporations were allowed to operate in Germany. For instance, Coca-Cola, IBM and of course, Ford. Henry Ford was rewarded by Hitler, even though he was aiding the Soviet Union at the same time. Seeing this, alongside with his antagonistic tendencies towards old Austrian and even imperial German culture, Hitler was essentially a German Atatürk or Mannerheim; promoting a form of bydlo German "nationalism" to further industrialise Germany, although his policies weren't really pro-European at heart.

 No.2175

File: 1587932669845.jpg (7.86 KB, 180x280, grunwaldberlin.jpg)

>>2173
>the NSDAP used the Teutonic order in its propaganda (which symbolised antagonism towards Balts, as that's what the Teutonic knights were dedicated towards doing)
They even compared the loss of Berlin to the Soviets as akin to the Battle of Grunwald when the latter was simply pure jewish strife and antagonism.

 No.2176

File: 1587934103315.jpg (8.54 KB, 119x134, Wappen-Tapiau-k.jpg)

Also, did you know the East Prussian town of Tapiau (now Gvardeysk, Kaliningrad Oblast) had the Tetragrammaton on its official coat of arms until 1946? The national socialists didn't bother getting rid of it, it took the communists to do away with the symbol, ironically.

 No.2177

File: 1587934178946-0.jpg (41.75 KB, 597x232, goebbels on sweden.jpg)

Also, not only did Hitler antagonise the Slavs and French, but Goebbels antagonised the Swedes. He lusted over their women like a jew or negroid would, but considered Swedish men "Germans on the outside and half-jews within". It's ironic since he also had an affair with an actual jewess, Elsa Janke.
Although high-ranking NS officials had quarrels with Czechs, Poles, Ukrainians, Frenchmen and even Swedes, they were more-or-less okay with literal Japanese-German mongrels, and supported the Japanese war effort in southeast Asia, even though the Japanese were not only mass beheading British/Australian/Dutch PoWs, not only raping Dutch women in Indonesia, but the imperial Japanese literally spared jewish women in Indonesia from rape or mistreatment if they disavowed their Dutch connections!

 No.2178

>>2176
>>2177
>Also,
Heh, we do sound kind of similar.

Anyway, I wonder how the Japanese are so different today. They're the most emasculated Asians, by far. It actually makes me question the scale of the atrocities they are said to have committed, since they are just so different today. Chemical castration? Something similar with modern Western contaminated food and water?

(Not that I doubt that they were capable of doing some very sick shit. They had it ingrained in them to obey their superiors' every orders.)

 No.2179

>>2178
>Anyway, I wonder how the Japanese are so different today. They're the most emasculated Asians, by far. It actually makes me question the scale of the atrocities they are said to have committed, since they are just so different today. Chemical castration? Something similar with modern Western contaminated food and water?
I'm tempted to say that the Japanese are the way they are today because they were doped up with pornography and cartoons which limited their desire to fight in real life, but to be fair, pornography had already existed in Imperial Japan right after the Meiji restoration. It's most likely the system forced on Japan after WW2, since there's no "developed" society more deprived than the Japanese one; organic communities are non-existent in contemporary Japan. Traditional Shintoism was mostly destroyed due to its inherent militancy, and organic lifestyles were already being phased out during the Meiji restoration, so without a militant imperative, most people began to work in a corporation for their entire life where no hard tasks are done, and the only other people that can be befriended are co-workers in their corporation. Thus many Japanese people don't work simply because of how dystopian it is, but not working always means they get to stay home; because there's no military service (unlike Scandinavia or Russia which are also deprived, but not to the extent that Japan is) Japanese people that don't work thus stay at home and become complete degenerates.
JWO diets also play a part in it, don't get me wrong, but the real reasoning for the death of Japanese masculinity seems to be psychological.

 No.2180

>>2179
Unfortunately their intense appeal to authority, which already existed before WW2 and probably before Western contact, made them very easily susceptible to the way their work culture is today. Confucianism is basically a serf ideology.

 No.2181

>>2180
It's "legalism" that's the serf ideology, not Confucianism. Nevertheless, the old Japanese got their large obedience to the emperor and thus all his orders via their cult centred around him (Shintoism deified the emperor due to his direct descent from Amaterasu), and since he surrendered to the west, most Japanese surrendered too. Western work ethic already derives from the earlier-mentioned Prussia, which was built on discipline (mostly for militancy, but also work culture in general), but even Prussia wasn't as orderly as Japan was. Thus Japan was ready to fully obey a work ethic that would deprive them of their previous culture and dignity.
Now that I think about it, it's probably Japan's heavy industrialisation along with all those previous conditions that put the nail in the coffin, as this meant that an organic society wouldn't ever rise out in Japan. It's also likely that industrial toxins and waste affect people's health, which affected Japan as well. If the Japanese were still to have abandoned militancy but kept a somewhat organic society with their western work ethic, they probably wouldn't be as effeminate as they are today.



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ domov ] [ b / # ] [ pol / # ] [ p / # ] [ int / # ] [ x / # ] [ gp / # ] [ kuko ]