[ domov ] [ b / # ] [ pol / # ] [ p / # ] [ int / # ] [ x / # ] [ gp / # ] [ kuko ]

/pol/ - Politika

Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1586216164276.png (42.58 KB, 800x551, 800px-Abecedarium.png)

 No.1924

Is the pervasiveness of the Latin alphabet also a linguistical war against us? Why did the Latin alphabet take so long in developing new letters for new sounds (z, w, j) and be so inconsistent in developing letters for other sounds (like sh, voiced th, voiceless th, zh, etc.)? Latinized Slavic languages attempted to account for this by placing accents on their c's, s's, and z's, but even then it's still quite a mess. Just look at Polish. Why the inconsistency in developing standardized renditions for the sh, ch, zh, etc. sounds in the Latinized world?

It's almost like the pervasiveness of the Latin alphabet aided in European languages becoming even more muddled and stratified against one another in certain respects. Like how German uses a w for the v sound, and how v in German is pronounced like an f. The (((church))) was hellbent on replacing prior scripts like runic and ogham as (((they))) considered such scripts to be satanic. Such scripts made innovations when needed, such as the Wynn character in Anglo-Saxon. The Latin script, due to its inherent rules that most standardized languages choose to follow, seems to curtail natural phonic evolution and make certain consonant clusters that would naturally occur in certain languages and follow a path of logic not occur at all.

All the sounds in our languages and the standard Latin alphabet only gives us 26 letters. What bullshit. Like our year and calendar system, it should be seriously weighed upon if the Latin alphabet should be still used for non Italic languages when the ZOGs are finally made history, or at least undergo serious modification (maybe something like the International Phonetic Alphabet). Heck, even modern Italic languages could stand to use new characters.

Also, somewhat related and showing how jewed linguistics is:
>The word schwa is from the Hebrew shva (שְׁוָא IPA: [ʃva], classical pronunciation: shəwāʼ [ʃəˑwɒːʔ]), the name of niqqud sign used to indicate the phoneme.
>The term was introduced by German linguists in the 19th century, and so the spelling sch is German in origin. It was first used in English texts between 1890 and 1895.[3][4]
>The symbol ⟨ə⟩ was used first by Johann Andreas Schmeller for the reduced vowel at the end of the German name Gabe. Alexander John Ellis, in his palæotype alphabet, used it for the similar English sound in but /bʌt/.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwa

 No.1925

Also to add, does the lack of consistency across languages with the same script make learning those languages more difficult? Learning a new script like Cyrillic (which is also jewed but not to the same degree) or Runic or even Hangul isn't that hard.

 No.1926

>>1925
>does the lack of consistency across languages with the same script make learning those languages more difficult?
Yes. The thing with Italian and its variant of Latin is that it's completely phonetic. Meanwhile, English and Danish (both written before in Runic, and after in a heavily Runicised alphabet) are hardly phonetic at all.
That being said, Runic does share a similar root with Latin, and they were technically innovations themselves of older alphabets. Though it's typically said that it's Phoenician, (though it's probable that Ogham is an earlier version of that), in-fact, all alphabets except Armenian, Georgian, and Ogham are said to be related in the mainstream, even the Indian and Chinese scripts. It's not so much the Latin alphabet itself that it's a problem, but the fact that it was standardised by the church and artificially regulated so that all western countries now use the Latin alphabet, and it doesn't take into account other languages' phonology; although the church is heavily to blame as they discarded the Runic and Ogham scripts, even the Gothic alphabet was actually a heavily edited and Runicised version of Greek that took into account Gothic phonetics. Nowadays because of printing (and later computer keyboards) a 26-letter Latin alphabet is the standard; at this rate even letters like æ and ø are going to be phased out. Alphabetical innovations are mostly natural, but it's hindered by the standardised alphabet and keyboard used today.

 No.1940

>>1924
Is the thumbnail and its enlarged pic in OP all black like it is for me, yet when you open it in a new tab you see that it's the alphabet? Might be a tech issue the admin should look into.

 No.1958

>>1940
it is.

 No.2022

Latin alphabet is a jewish conspiracy to exterminate all white people. Since the Big Bang jews have been plotting against white people because they hate them so much. One rabbi once propposed that white people are most vulnerable when we strip them of their superior germanic and slavic runes and force them to use judaised latin alphabet. Don't be fooled. Literally everything including the Universe has been created by jews to tortute poor innocent white people who dindu nuffin. If you disagree you are harrasing me.



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ domov ] [ b / # ] [ pol / # ] [ p / # ] [ int / # ] [ x / # ] [ gp / # ] [ kuko ]